Skip to content

Visit us at www.anandandanand.com

Patents Rewind – An Anand and Anand Blog
  • PATENTS REWIND : AN ANAND AND ANAND BLOG
  • Appeal, Bombay High Court, Indian Patent Office, Indian Patents Act, IPAB, Uncategorized

    Chemtura’s Patent restored

    Published by

    patents_rewind

    on

    June 21, 2017

    The Bombay High Court’s division bench has set aside the order of the IPAB revoking Chemtura’s patent IN213608 and has directed the Controller of Patents to restore the patent on the e-register ( Order dated 19-06-2017 ). IPAB had earlier revoked Chemtura’s Patent for non compliance of section 8 and lack…

    Continue reading →: Chemtura’s Patent restored
  • Appeal, Bombay High Court, Division Bench, Indian Patents Act, IPR, Section 8, Uncategorized

    Chemtura’s Patent restored

    Published by

    patents_rewind

    on

    June 20, 2017

    The Bombay High Court’s division bench has set aside the order of the IPAB revoking Chemtura’s patent IN213608 and has directed the Controller of Patents to restore the patent on the e-register. IPAB had earlier revoked Chemtura’s Patent for non compliance of section 8 and lack of inventive step. Chemtura…

    Continue reading →: Chemtura’s Patent restored
  • enforcement, Indian Patents Act, IPR, Life Sciences, Supreme Court, Uncategorized

    SC allows Cipla to withdraw its petition

    Published by

    patents_rewind

    on

    June 19, 2017

    The Supreme Court (SC) of India has allowed domestic drug manufacturer Cipla, which to withdraw its petition in respect of the patent dispute with Roche over the drug erlotinib hydrochloride. The petition was filed by Cipla challenging the High Court’s order holding that it had infringed Roche’s patent. The two companies, Roche…

    Continue reading →: SC allows Cipla to withdraw its petition
  • Indian Patent Office, Indian Patents Act, IPR, Uncategorized

    Reasons beyond control necessary for condoning delay in submitting response to Examination report

    Published by

    patents_rewind

    on

    June 15, 2017

    The Indian Patent office while considering a petition filed by Cisco Technologies under rule 137 for condonation of delay in filing response to examination beyond the statutory period, refused to allow such delay as according to the controller all possible reasons as mentioned by the applicant’s agent such as lack…

    Continue reading →: Reasons beyond control necessary for condoning delay in submitting response to Examination report
  • Appeal, Indian Patents Act, IPAB, Uncategorized

    Rules for appointment of IPAB Chairman, Vice-Chairman, Technical Member

    Published by

    patents_rewind

    on

    June 14, 2017

    In exercise of the powers conferred by section 184 of the Finance Act, 2017 (7of 2017), the Central Government has notified the Tribunal, Appellate Tribunal and other Authorities (Qualifications, Experience and other Conditions of Service of Members) Rules, 2017 on 1st June 2017. These rules apply to 19 Appellate Tribunal…

    Continue reading →: Rules for appointment of IPAB Chairman, Vice-Chairman, Technical Member
  • National Biodiversity Act, Uncategorized

    Patent Office Issues Notice to Streamline Disposal of Cases Relating to Biological Resources

    Published by

    patents_rewind

    on

    June 12, 2017

    A recent circular by the Patent Office on issues relating to biological resources and patenting may come as a reprieve for patent applicants using biological materials from India in their inventions. Section 6(1) of The Biological Diversity Act, 2002 prohibits any person from applying for any intellectual property right in…

    Continue reading →: Patent Office Issues Notice to Streamline Disposal of Cases Relating to Biological Resources
  • enforcement, Indian Patents Act, Infringement, Injunctions, IPR, Pharmaceuticals, Uncategorized

    Non-compliant defendants face permanent injunction

    Published by

    patents_rewind

    on

    June 8, 2017

    DSM Sinochem Pharmaceuticals has been granted permanent injunction against Sinopharma Weiqida pharmaceuticals as the defendants failed to timely submit the defense (written statement) and pay the costs imposed by the Court. The Plaintiffs DSM Sinochem Pharmaceuticals sued Sinopharma Weiqida pharmaceuticals for permanent injunction to restrain them from using , manufacturing ,…

    Continue reading →: Non-compliant defendants face permanent injunction
  • Access Benefit Sharing, Life Sciences, National Biodiversity Act, Plant Variety, Uncategorized, Uttarakhand High Court

    Access Benefit Sharing

    Published by

    patents_rewind

    on

    June 6, 2017

    Justice U.C. Dhyani of Uttarakhand High court passed a ruling deciding several writ petitions filed by various paper mill companies against notices issued against them by the Uttarakhand State Biodiversity Board (SBB). The impugned notices were sent by SBB as it considered that the petitioners failed to provide prior intimation to…

    Continue reading →: Access Benefit Sharing
  • biosimilar, Copetition Comission of India, Drugs Act, Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940, Pharmaceuticals, Uncategorized

    CCI orders Investigation against Roche

    Published by

    patents_rewind

    on

    April 26, 2017

    The Competition Commission of India (CCI), based on a prima facie determination on contravention of Section 4(2)(c) of the Competition Act, ordered investigation against Roche with respect to the cancer drug, Trastuzumab. The complaint was filed by Biocon and Mylan Pharmaceuticals. Facts of the case: – Genentech developed a monoclonal…

    Continue reading →: CCI orders Investigation against Roche
  • Indian Patent Office, IPR, Uncategorized

    Annual Report – IPO

    Published by

    patents_rewind

    on

    April 6, 2017

    The annual Report 2015-16 of the Office of Controller General of Patents, Designs & Trade Marks has been published. Some noticeable points are as follows:- 10% increase in patent filing compared to 2014-15. Total filing in 2015-16 being 40,946. 8% filings have increased by Indian applicants, and approximately 10% by…

    Continue reading →: Annual Report – IPO
Previous Page Next Page

Greetings

Welcome to Patents Rewind, Anand and Anand’s Patents and Designs blog that offers you an Indian perspective on issues surrounding patent and design eligibility and enforcement through latest case law and developments in the Indian patents and designs landscape.

Let’s connect

  • LinkedIn
  • Mail

Join us!

Stay updated with our posts.

Recent posts

  • Calcutta High Court Grants Interim Injunction in NOCIL’s 4-ADPA Process Patent and Trade Secret Dispute

  • Delhi High Court Grants Ex Parte Injunction Against Intas in Novartis’ Quia Timet Action Over Dabrafenib Patent

  • Delhi High Court Rejects Challenge to Territorial Jurisdiction in Patent Infringement Suit

  • Delhi High Court Grants Rs. 152 Crore Damages in Communication Components Antenna vs Rosenberger

  • No Mechanical Notices for Pre-Grant Opposition: Madras High Court Emphasises Application of Mind Under Rule 55(3)

  • Delhi High Court Holds Section 25(1) Pre-Grant Opposition Hearing Cannot Substitute Statutory Hearing Under Section 14

Patents Rewind – An Anand and Anand Blog

  • Mail
  • LinkedIn
  • PATENTS REWIND : AN ANAND AND ANAND BLOG

Blog at WordPress.com.

  • Subscribe Subscribed
    Patents Rewind - An Anand and Anand Blog
    Join 107 other subscribers

    Have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.

  • Patents Rewind - An Anand and Anand Blog
    View site in Reader
    Manage subscriptionsSign upLog in
    Report this content
    Collapse this bar

Notifications