-
Continue reading →: Probiotic Patent of Kibow Biotech Inc. upheld by the Madras High Court
The Madras High Court dismissed a writ challenging an Intellectual Properties Appellate Board (IPAB) order No. 262/2013 in respect of revocation proceedings ORA/29/2011/PT/MUM, for the Patent No.224100. The impugned patent was granted to Kibow Biotech Inc., based on a PCT application filed claiming priority from US Patent Application No.10.672,622 filed…
-
Continue reading →: Patent application for formulation of Valaganciclovir refused by the IPO
A patent application of F. Hoffmann-La Roche AG, for “POWDER FORMULATION FOR VALAGANCICLOVIR” has been refused by the Indian Patent office (IPO). The invention, as disclosed by the applicant aimed to improve the stability profile and the manufacturability of the powder dosage form and the formulation procedure was changed from a dry mix…
-
Continue reading →: Renewal fee under Protection of Plant Varieties and Farmers’ Rights Rules, 2003 has to be computed as per Rule 39
A Writ petition filed by Maharashtra Hybrid Seed Co Pvt. Ltd. (hereafter ‘Petitioner’) has been allowed by the Delhi High Court and it has been clarified that Rule 39 of the Protection of Plant Varieties and Farmers’ Rights Rules, 2003 (hereafter ‘the said Rules’) is a special rule relating to…
-
Continue reading →: SC has set aside the order of the DHC that revoked Monsanto’s Indian Patent relating to BT technology
In a historic win, the Supreme Court of India (SC) has today set aside the order the Division Bench of the Delhi High Court (DHC) that revoked Monsanto’s Indian Patent No. 214436 relating to BT technology. A suit for infringement and passing off was filed by Monsanto Technology LLC, Monsanto…
-
Continue reading →: Comments on Draft (Amendment) Patent, 2018
The Ministry of Commerce and industry had published draft Patent Rules to further amend the Patent Rules, 2003 for comments from stakeholders. Anand and Anand has provided its comments to the same. The comments can be accessed here- comment.
-
Continue reading →: COMPOSITE SUIT FOR DESIGN INFRINGEMENT AND PASSING OFF MAINTAINABLE
The three-judge bench verdict in Mohan Lal v. Sona Paint, overruled by Five-judge bench of the Delhi High Court in Carlsberg Breweries A/S. V. Som Distilleries and Breweries Ltd. The High Court held that two causes of action – one for relief in respect of passing off, and another in…
-
Continue reading →: Draft Patent Rules Published by Ministry of Commerce and industry
The Ministry of Commerce and industry has published draft Rules to further amend the Patent Rules, 2003. Objections or suggestions, can be addressed to Shri Sushil K Satpute, Director, DIPP, Ministry of Commerce and Industry, Government of India, Udyog Bhawan, New Delhi-110011 or by e-mail at sushil.satpute@nic.in within 30 days…
-
Continue reading →: The IPO achieved another milestone – issued patent number IN300000
The Indian Patent Office achieved another milestone and has issued its patent number IN300000 in August 2018. The patent has been issued to BASF Corporation for carbon monoxide conversion catalyst. There has been a more than 170% increase in the number of applications examined in between 2016-2017. This sharp rise…
-
Continue reading →: Pre-grant Opposition against Novo Nordisk’s Patent application dismissed
A pre-grant opposition filed by Intepat IP services in respect of Novo Nordisk’s Patent Application number 2940/DELNP/2007 has been refused by the Ld. Controller, Mr. Naveen Mathur and a patent (No. 299153) granted to Novo Nordisk after examination. As provided in the decision, the invention covered by the application relates to…
-
Continue reading →: FIRST JUDGEMENT ON SEP AND FRAND IN INDIA
The Delhi High Court delivered India’s first ever judgement on standard essential patents. Plaintiff, Koninklije Philips N.V., filed two suits being CS(OS) No. 1034/2009 and CS (OS) No.1082/2009 alleging infringement of its essential DVD Video Player patent, seeking the reliefs of permanent injunction, directions to the defendants to provide complete…
