Skip to content

Visit us at www.anandandanand.com

Patents Rewind – An Anand and Anand Blog
  • PATENTS REWIND : AN ANAND AND ANAND BLOG
  • Uncategorized

    DISCUSSION PAPER ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE (AI) BY NITI AAYOG

    Published by

    patents_rewind

    on

    June 22, 2018

    Recognizing AI’s potential to transform economies and the need for India to strategize its approach, Hon’ble Finance Minister, in his budget speech for 2018 – 2019, mandated NITI Aayog to establish the National Program on AI, with a view to guiding the research and development in new and emerging technologies.…

    Continue reading →: DISCUSSION PAPER ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE (AI) BY NITI AAYOG
  • IPR, Uncategorized

    Ordinance to amend the Commercial Courts, Commercial Division and Commercial Appellate Division of High Courts Act, 2015

    Published by

    patents_rewind

    on

    June 4, 2018

    Government has notified an ordinance on May 3, 2018 to amend the Commercial Courts, Commercial Division and the Commercial Appellate Division in High Courts Act of 2015. The main Highlights of the Ordinance are:- The pecuniary jurisdiction of the Commercial Courts’ has been widened. The value of subject matter of…

    Continue reading →: Ordinance to amend the Commercial Courts, Commercial Division and Commercial Appellate Division of High Courts Act, 2015
  • Uncategorized

    Patent Agent Examination to be conducted before December, 2018

    Published by

    patents_rewind

    on

    June 4, 2018

    As per a  recent notice issued by the Office of Controller General of Patents, Designs and Trademarks (CGPDTM), the Patent Agent Examination is likely to be conducted before December, 2018. Detailed information will be made available on official website http://www.ipindia.nic.in after finalization of schedule and other official requirements.  

    Continue reading →: Patent Agent Examination to be conducted before December, 2018
  • Indian Patent Office, Indian Patents Act, IPR, Uncategorized

    Writ seeking directions for UOI to enforce norms relating to “working” of patents disposed

    Published by

    patents_rewind

    on

    May 11, 2018

    A Public Interest Litigation (PIL) was filed at the Delhi High Court under Article 226 of Indian Constitution as a writ of mandamus (Shamnad Basheer Vs. Union of India (UOI) & Others) seeking directions for the Union of India (UOI) to perform their statutory duty to enforce norms relating to…

    Continue reading →: Writ seeking directions for UOI to enforce norms relating to “working” of patents disposed
  • Indian Patent Office, Indian Patents Act, IPR, Uncategorized

    Rule 138 and 137 can be invoked for all National phase applications filed in India prior to Patent [Amendment] Rules, 2016

    Published by

    patents_rewind

    on

    May 11, 2018

    The Hon’ble High Court of Delhi in a recent order in a writ petition held that where an Indian National Phase Application has been filed prior to the Patent [Amendment] Rules, 2016, the unamended Rule 138 shall be invoked and not the amended Rule 138. It is pertinent to mention…

    Continue reading →: Rule 138 and 137 can be invoked for all National phase applications filed in India prior to Patent [Amendment] Rules, 2016
  • Indian Patent Office, Indian Patents Act, IPR, Life Sciences, Natural Justice, Uncategorized

    Post grant Opposition filed on or before one year of publication under of grant is maintainable

    Published by

    patents_rewind

    on

    April 25, 2018

    In a recent decision, Asstt. Controller of Patents and design, Dr. Rachna Yadav has held that a post grant Opposition filed at the Indian Patent office on or before the expiry of one year of publication of grant under section 43(2) is maintainable. Two Oppositions were filed on 30.03.2017 and 31.03.2017…

    Continue reading →: Post grant Opposition filed on or before one year of publication under of grant is maintainable
  • Indian Patent Office, Indian Patents Act, IPR, Uncategorized

    Annual report for the financial year 2016-17 published by the IPO

    Published by

    patents_rewind

    on

    April 25, 2018

    The Indian Patent Office (IPO) has published the Annual report for the financial year 2016-17 (based on data from 1st April 2016 to 31st March 2017). As per the Annual report, as a result of the various procedural reforms implemented during the year, the office of CGPDTM has made remarkable achievements…

    Continue reading →: Annual report for the financial year 2016-17 published by the IPO
  • Indian Patent Office, Indian Patents Act, Uncategorized

    Definition of “start-up” under the start-up India initiative

    Published by

    patents_rewind

    on

    April 25, 2018

    Ministry of Commerce and Industry through a notification clarified the definition of start-ups under the start-up India initiative. An entity as per this notification shall be considered as a Startup if it fulfills all of the following: Upto a period of seven years from the date of incorporation/registration, if it…

    Continue reading →: Definition of “start-up” under the start-up India initiative
  • Indian Patents Act, Injunctions, IPR, Uncategorized

    Injunction granted even when the Patent was under challenge

    Published by

    patents_rewind

    on

    April 17, 2018

    Pfizer Inc. filed a suit for permanent injunction restraining infringement of Indian patent no. IN209250 (which covers and claims the commercial product Sunitinib) and IN268331 (which covers the claims the commercial product Tigecycline) against Nagesh Palepu and others. The Defendants list Tigecycline and Sunitinib on their website in their list…

    Continue reading →: Injunction granted even when the Patent was under challenge
  • Indian Patent Office, Indian Patents Act, IPR, Life Sciences, Uncategorized

    Monsanto Technology’s patent for BT cotton held not patentable

    Published by

    patents_rewind

    on

    April 12, 2018

    The Delhi High Court has dismissed Monsanto Technology’s patent for BT cotton and the claims of the Patent have been held to be not patentable under section 3(j) of the Act. Delhi High court also dismissed Monsanto’s plea to enforce said patent partially allowing the counter-claims of Indian seed companies –…

    Continue reading →: Monsanto Technology’s patent for BT cotton held not patentable
Previous Page Next Page

Greetings

Welcome to Patents Rewind, Anand and Anand’s Patents and Designs blog that offers you an Indian perspective on issues surrounding patent and design eligibility and enforcement through latest case law and developments in the Indian patents and designs landscape.

Let’s connect

  • LinkedIn
  • Mail

Join us!

Stay updated with our posts.

Recent posts

  • Calcutta High Court Grants Interim Injunction in NOCIL’s 4-ADPA Process Patent and Trade Secret Dispute

  • Delhi High Court Grants Ex Parte Injunction Against Intas in Novartis’ Quia Timet Action Over Dabrafenib Patent

  • Delhi High Court Rejects Challenge to Territorial Jurisdiction in Patent Infringement Suit

  • Delhi High Court Grants Rs. 152 Crore Damages in Communication Components Antenna vs Rosenberger

  • No Mechanical Notices for Pre-Grant Opposition: Madras High Court Emphasises Application of Mind Under Rule 55(3)

  • Delhi High Court Holds Section 25(1) Pre-Grant Opposition Hearing Cannot Substitute Statutory Hearing Under Section 14

Patents Rewind – An Anand and Anand Blog

  • Mail
  • LinkedIn
  • PATENTS REWIND : AN ANAND AND ANAND BLOG

Blog at WordPress.com.

  • Subscribe Subscribed
    Patents Rewind - An Anand and Anand Blog
    Join 107 other subscribers

    Have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.

  • Patents Rewind - An Anand and Anand Blog
    View site in Reader
    Manage subscriptionsSign upLog in
    Report this content
    Collapse this bar

Notifications